Ethics Summary

Ethics Summary - erroneously) categorized as mere

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ethics Summary Thou shall not interfere with other people’s computer work. Thou shall think about the social consequences of the program you are writing or the system you are designing. Thou shall always use a computer in ways that insure consideration and respect for your fellow humans. The Internet has changed much about everyday life. The Internet promises freedom from many of the delays and limitations of the physical world. But in doing so, could the Internet also distance people from the rules and moral conceptions that bind them in the "real world"? Because in cyberspace people can exist independent of their names, identities, faces, and personalities, they often transcend the real world's moral and legal boundaries. Although the Internet allows them to transcend or violate these boundaries more easily, it generally has not changed moral and ethical concepts (notions of what it means to "do wrong.") However, these notions are under attack. The ease with which content on the Internet can be (often
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: erroneously) categorized as mere "information" threatens to erode legal conceptions of intellectual property protection and our ethical definition of theft. The word to best describe our reason for internet crimes is depersonalization. It shows that the simple personal courtesies extended to others, and the privacy boundaries almost instinctively respected can be confused, neglected, or simply ignored on the Internet. It is easier--and thus more tempting--to snoop in cyberspace because it is easier to avoid detection. Although the Internet may in some instances make it easier to "be bad," it has not changed what it means to "be bad." If the architecture of the Internet is not responsible for the moral values that lead to virtual transgressions, then it is unlikely that changing that architecture will have any real reformatory effect. http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/araboSent.htm...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

Ethics Summary - erroneously) categorized as mere

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online