page_60 - Page 60 We then...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
< previous page page_60 next page > Page 60 We then present an example application, normally based on our consultancy efforts, which illustrates use of the particular methodology of concern as the "dominant" methodology within the TSI framework. A critique, setting out the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology follows that. Our task in each critique is to craft an intertwining of lines of argument, to manufacture a meta-paradigmatic net with which we can assess the legitimacies and limitations of the various systems methodologies at different levels (paradigm being a general term that represents the pulling together of issues relating to ideology, epistemology, ontology, methodology and method). In fact each systems methodology is assessed in terms of its theoretical presuppositions, the methodological guidelines it offers, its ideological biases and its utility. This hopefully comprehensive critique is followed in each chapter by a case study that summarises a problem situation with which
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/21/2011 for the course MGT 03 taught by Professor Kasra during the Spring '11 term at Tanta University.

Page1 / 4

page_60 - Page 60 We then...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online