page_96 - <previouspage page_96 nextpage> Page 96 The...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
< previous page page_96 next page > Page 96 The existence of additional irrelevant features of structure which hamper viability is found. System 2, 3, 4 or 5 of an organisation becomes "autopoietic" and seeks viability in its own right. In a viable system, Systems 2, 3, 4 and 5 should serve the whole system by promoting the implementation function and should not be allowed to function at the expense of the system as a wholethey should not become bureaucratic. System 2 is not fully established because local managers of System 1 resent interference from this relatively junior control echelon. System 4 is weak because it is regarded as a "staff" function and its recommendations are ignoredaccording to Beer, it should be part of "line"
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
management. System 5 collapses into System 3 because System 4 is weak. System 3 managers are found interfering in the management process at System 1 level. System 5 is not creating an
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/21/2011 for the course MGT 03 taught by Professor Kasra during the Spring '11 term at Tanta University.

Page1 / 4

page_96 - &lt;previouspage page_96 nextpage&gt; Page 96 The...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online