page_120 - Page 120 where...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
< previous page page_120 next page > Page 120 where differences of opinion over which strategy to pursue prevent decisive action being taken. An interesting feature of SAST, implicit in the work of its originators, is the assumption that once issues of pluralism have been overcome, the traditional methods of management science (those found corresponding to the simple-unitary area of the "system of systems methodologies") will be sufficient to finish the job. This is why we have placed SAST in the simple pluralist "cell" of the "system of systems methodologies". SAST could in principle, however, be used in any pluralist situation to contribute to the development of mutual understanding, or learning about our and others' positions. It is just that to deal with complex-pluralist situations (we are speaking about ideal types) it would need much additional assistance, in ways not conceived of by the originators, from cybernetic thinking.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
There are a number of versions of the SAST approach which
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/21/2011 for the course MGT 03 taught by Professor Kasra during the Spring '11 term at Tanta University.

Page1 / 3

page_120 - Page 120 where...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online