page_134 - <previouspage page_134 nextpage> Page 134...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
< previous page page_134 next page > Page 134 as presenting peculiar difficulties of their own. Since SAST tends to ignore these, assuming that all the difficulties stem from pluralism, it offers only a partial solution to those set in complex-pluralist contexts, and requires some further thinking if it is going to make a genuine contribution in that domain. Methodolog y (a) As was mentioned, SAST for the most part honours the principles on which it is based and these principles can be seen to be of importance. Perhaps it is a little too ambitious in seeking overall synthesis, but this may be no bad thing. (b) Of considerable concern, however, is the fact that circumstances in many organisations may frustrate
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
honouring of the participative principle. If so, SAST's usefulness as a methodology is inevitably curtailed, and its legitimacy must, in terms of its own philosophy, be open to question. It becomes little more than a kind of expanded multigroup brainstorming without any justification for its
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 3

page_134 - &lt;previouspage page_134 nextpage&gt; Page 134...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online