page_219 - Page 219...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
< previous page page_219 next page > Page 219 organisations can be "prisons" or coercive systems (when planners do not submit their designs to rational argumentation) that is most easily traced in his work. It is not surprising, of course, that the metaphors Ulrich uses to address the "real world" are those most relevant to his purposeful systems paradigm. The effect of all this, however (from the TSI viewpoint), is that Ulrich's criticisms of systems science and cybernetics seem somewhat overplayed and the important role that instrumental reason can offer when handled critically in planning tends, therefore, to get neglected. This is unfortunate since rational social action will depend on what it is possible to do and the choice of efficient meansmatters of instrumental reasonas well as upon what we ought to doa matter of practical reason. We would not want to labour this pointexperts do have a role in Ulrich's systems approach. It may simply be a matter of emphasis. Nevertheless, the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/21/2011 for the course MGT 03 taught by Professor Kasra during the Spring '11 term at Tanta University.

Page1 / 3

page_219 - Page 219...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online