checkpoint Legal and Ethical Issues

checkpoint Legal and Ethical Issues - In Lau v. Nichols ,...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: In Lau v. Nichols , 414 U.S. 563 (1974), parents of Chinese-speaking students argued that the San Francisco Unified School District's failure to provide equal educational opportunities for children who did not speak English amounted to a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. There were in fact two groups of children who brought this action: (1) 1,790 Chinese-American school children who spoke no English and were taught none, and (2) 1,066 Chinese-American school children who spoke no English but received some remedial instruction in English. According to Ninth Circuit Judge (Shirley) Hufstedler, plaintiffs did not seek to have their classes taught in both English and Chinese. "All they ask is that they receive instruction in the English language." (Lau v. Nichols, 1997) Because the funds are limited, it is hard for a school to provide educational opportunities. School district can only do so much with different speaking languages other than the English language. I do believe this child and other children deserve equal education rights, and the school language....
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

checkpoint Legal and Ethical Issues - In Lau v. Nichols ,...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online