RSM333mid10 SOLUTION - UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Joseph L Rotman School of Management Feb 24 2010 Buti/Farooqi RSM333 MID-TERM EXAMINATION Ganguly

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Joseph L. Rotman School of Management Feb. 24, 2010 Buti/Farooqi RSM333 MID-TERM EXAMINATION Ganguly SOLUTIONS 1. (a) The value of firm A and the value of firm B are V A = EBIT(1- T C ) k = 15m × . 7 . 15 = $70m , V B = V U + T C D = V A + T C D = $70m + 0 . 3 × 20m = $76m . (b) Owning 1% of firm A or firm B respectively provides an annual cashflow of: CF A = 0 . 01 × EBIT(1- T C ) = $105,000 , CF B = 0 . 01 × (EBIT- k d D )(1- T C ) = 0 . 01 × (15m- . 08 × 20m)(1- . 3) = $93,800 . (c) The costs are the following: Cost of 1% of equity of firm A = 0 . 01 × $73m = $730 , 000 , Cost of 1% of equity of firm B = 0 . 01 × ($77m- $20m) = $570 , 000 . (d) The payoff of 1% ownership in firm A is: 0 . 01EBIT(1- T C ). It can be decomposed as: . 01 × EBIT(1- T C ) = 0 . 01(EBIT- k d D )(1- T C ) + 0 . 01 k d D (1- T C ) . Since this payoff equation holds for every state of the world, the riskiness of 0 . 01 × EBIT(1- T C ) is the same as that of 0 . 01(EBIT- k d D )(1- T C ) + 0 . 01 k d D (1- T C ). The payoff 0 . 01(EBIT- k d D )(1- T C ) can be achieved by investing in 1% of firm B’s equity and the payoff of 0 . 01 k d D (1- T C ) can be achieved by investing 0 . 01 D (1- T C ) in firm B’s debt. To summarize: 1 Original strategy Cost Expected cashflow 1% of A’s equity $730,000 $105,000 New strategy Cost Expected cashflow 1% of B’s equity $570,000 $93,800 $140,000 of B’s debt $140,000 $11,200 Total $710,000 $105,000 2. (a) Before the repurchase, the firm is an all equity firm and we have k = r f + β XY Z ( E [ r m ]- r f ) = 0 . 05 + 1 . 2 × . 08 = 0 . 146 , V U = EBIT(1- T C ) k = $4,000,000 × . 6 . 146 = $16,438,356 . (b) Since a higher level of debt is always better due to the larger tax shield effect, the optimal debt level is D = $8,000,000. The value of the company becomes: V L = V U + T C D = $16,438,356 + 0 . 4 × $8,000,000 = $19,638,356 . (c) Now the highest level of debt is not necessarily optimal, the preferred amount of debt will be the one that gives higher net benefits after taking into account both the tax shield benefits and the expected costs of financial distress....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/23/2011 for the course RSM 333 taught by Professor Sabrinabutti during the Spring '11 term at University of Toronto- Toronto.

Page1 / 5

RSM333mid10 SOLUTION - UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Joseph L Rotman School of Management Feb 24 2010 Buti/Farooqi RSM333 MID-TERM EXAMINATION Ganguly

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online