400_Project_Presentation_Evaluation_-assessment_rubric_1_ -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
MGTB-400 Project Presentation Evaluation Team ________ The team is graded as a unit Presentation Quality 1. Quality of the oral presentation Were the points and issues clearly and concisely communicated in a professional manner? Poor: There were inconsistencies in the presentation; the issues were not clearly defined; the delivery was ineffective. 1 2 Fair: The key points were effectively communicated; the oral communications met a minimum standard. 3 4 5 Good: The key points were clear and concisely presented; the oral communication was above average. 6 7 8 Excellent: Communication was highly effective; issues were clearly defined; method of delivery was professional. 9 10 2. Quality of the visual and supporting aids Were they clearly presented and easily interpretable? Poor: The use of visual aids was weak; the information presented was disorganized and or unclear in communication. 1 2 Fair: The use of visual aids supported the presentation; some material was too dense and diminished presentation effectiveness. 3 4 5 Good: Clear and effective use of supporting visual aids; the material complimented the oral presentation. 6
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/26/2011 for the course BUSINESS A 00 taught by Professor Misc during the Spring '11 term at Saint Louis.

Page1 / 3

400_Project_Presentation_Evaluation_-assessment_rubric_1_ -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online