400_Project_Report_Evaluation_-assessment_rubric_1_

400_Project_Report_Evaluation_-assessment_rubric_1_ -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
MGTB-400 Project Written Report Evaluation Team ____ The team grade is as a unit. Analysis Quality 1. Quality of the situational analysis How well did the team lay out the market environment and situational factors that affect the plan? Poor: The analysis of the situation was unclear. There was minimal effective use of analytical techniques. 1 2 Fair: There was some base level of analysis. It did not fully define the situation. 3 4 5 Good: The analysis was effective. The key aspects of the situation were identified. Good use of tools and analytical techniques. 6 7 8 Excellent: The analysis was comprehensive. It accurately depicted the situation. Tools used effectively. 9 10 2. Quality of the key issues analysis How well did the team describe what appear to be the major problems, key issues and opportunities for the firm? Poor: There were significant weaknesses in identification and descriptions of the key issues. 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/26/2011 for the course BUSINESS A 00 taught by Professor Misc during the Spring '11 term at Saint Louis.

Page1 / 2

400_Project_Report_Evaluation_-assessment_rubric_1_ -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online