BUSINESSLAW CHAPTER 36 - Business Law

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
MARCH 2009 BUSINESS LAW CHAPTER 36 DEBRA BARONE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS AND CASE PROBLEMS 1. The court found in favor of Belize. If there were to be any exclusions, they should have been stated clearly in the policy. The policy did not state that the classification “carpentry” defined certain covered risks. The insurance company was obligated to pay. 2. The defense for Carls is the two year incontestability clause required by state law. So, Standard can not use Carls' statements made in his insurance application unless the policy had been in effect for less than two years. Standard can not seek recission of the insurance policy. 3. Serrano did not own the boat when he applied for a second policy on October 6, 1989, nor did he own it at the time of loss. He did not have an isurable interest in the boat. The policy is void as because of misrepresentation of facts. 4. No, she can not. Because Foster had no insurable interest in the life of McClurkin, the insurance policy was void. 5.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/22/2011 for the course FINANCE BUSINESS L taught by Professor Daviddubois during the Spring '09 term at SUNY Empire State.

Page1 / 2

BUSINESSLAW CHAPTER 36 - Business Law

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online