GENERALIZATIONS ABOUT THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDY OF WAR AND PEACE

GENERALIZATIONS ABOUT THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDY OF WAR AND PEACE

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
GENERALIZATIONS ABOUT THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDY OF WAR AND PEACE WAR 1. Anthropologists have concentrated on warfare in prehistoric and "primitive" societies, that is, in societies which are pre-state (prior to civilization) and non-state (bands, tribes, chiefdoms). 2. Anthropologists have been divided into two schools of thought over whether "primitives" are warlike or peaceful, or even whether human nature in general is warlike or peaceful. 3. Recently, indigenous and other societies are no longer viewed as pristine isolates, but significantly influenced by the political economy of larger systems (regional, national, international, world). 4. More attention is being given to contemporary hot spots such as Bosnia, Burma, Colombia, Guatemala, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka. 5. Under the influence of postmodernism more attention is also being given to variation, dynamic processes, everyday experience, multiple actors and voices, politics, etc. 6. Much work is still needed to develop more useful definitions of war and classifications of the types of
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/28/2011 for the course PACE 345 taught by Professor Brucebarnes during the Spring '10 term at University of Hawaii, Manoa.

Page1 / 2

GENERALIZATIONS ABOUT THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDY OF WAR AND PEACE

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online