Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
HISTORIC STATEMENTS AND TRENDS Benedict (1939) Benedict points to the fundamental double-standard regarding homicide --- both murder and war are homicide, but murder is penalized even by death, while homicide in war is glorified. War is homicide that is rewarded with unquestioned acclaim and gratitude from one's fellows, whereas murder is homicide with penalties including in some cases capital punishment (pp. 370-371). War is not a universal (p. 374), some societies like the Serrano Indians of southern California have no concept of war (p. 371). However, war can also be found among some primitives with horrible acts (p. 382). But there are different kinds of war (p. 370), and some wars much more destructive and even suicidal (pp. 373, 378). Mead (1940, 1964). War is organized [armed] conflict between two groups as groups (p. 127). War is not a biological necessity, it is a cultural invention. It is not a universal, not all societies have the idea of war (p. 127-128). War is inevitable only to the extent that a society has and accepts the idea as one way to manage certain situations (p. 129). Simple and complex societies, mild and aggressive societies, will all go to war if they have the idea (p. 130). Mead appears to distinguish between war, duels, and vendettas (blood revenge) (p. 130). War is part of our thought whether in our history, diplomacy, or children's toys (p. 132). However, war is an idea and not inevitable (p. 132). Humans need to realize that war is a bad idea, a poor invention, and that, since it is not a biological necessity and therefore inevitability, it can be replaced by a better idea, a better invention (p. 133)[i.e., peace and nonviolent conflict resolution]. Montagu (1942) Biological anthropologist Montagu critiques the ideas of one of his influential teachers, Sir Arthur Keith, the "biological-nature-of-war school" --- that war is natural, universal, and inevitable, a part of the struggle of survival of the fittest [social Darwinism] by questioning what is nature and natural (only a social construct), the indiscriminate application of terms like war to nature as in animal aggression which only conflates matters, and argues that war is an invention
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4


This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online