sol.hw9.stat3011 - Homework 9 Solutions Yicheng Kang...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Homework 9 Solutions Yicheng Kang November 18, 2010 Problem 9.21 9.21.a The variable has two categories: (1)garlic being more effective; (2)placebo being more effective. And the parameter is the proportion of the population indicating that garlic is more effective. Lets denote it by p . 9.21.b H : p = 1 2 , H a : p 6 = 1 2 . Check large sample size assumption:37 15 , 29 15. 9.21.c z = 37 / (37 + 29)- 1 / 2 p . 5 2 / (37 + 29) = 0 . 984732 9.21.d > 2*(1-pnorm(0.984732)) [1] 0.3247557 1 Thus the p-value is 0.32. If given significance level 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there is no real difference between garlic and placebo. Problem 9.32 9.32.a Variable: the number of hours workers work per week. Parameter: mean . 9.32.b H : = 40 H a : 6 = 40 9.32.c t = 37 . 8- 40 13 . 3 / 197 =- 2 . 321690 . 9.32.d > 2*(1-pt(2.321690,196)) [1] 0.02127725 The P-value is 0.02. Thus we may reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the population mean work week for this age group differs from 40 hours. Problem 9.40 After changing 20.9 to 2.9, the test statistic changes from 2.21 to 1.98, and the P-value changes from 0.04 t 0.06. The test statistic is less extreme, and the P-value is no longer smaller than 0.05. We can no longer reject the null hypothesis. The conclusion does depend on the single observation of 20.9....
View Full Document

Page1 / 7

sol.hw9.stat3011 - Homework 9 Solutions Yicheng Kang...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online