This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Contradiction ex. Econ sanctions are a contradictory action b/c they can be defined as affecting trade. However, any ac tion that a gov. takes affects trade. Leveraging either use def. and Critique of truth of resolution Gender Ks Theory arguments Deontological NC dont make sense because they talk about moral prohibitions. So, using sanctions , implying a positive obligation, doesnt make sense. If deontology talks about the ends, then it is not deontology Burdens ways to make goal Espistemology is flawed Ink prestandards to multiple parts of rez. A prioris need warrants Preempt standards arguments Dont simply outline burden conditions, but demonstrate why opp. Cant meet...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/09/2011 for the course HIST 101 taught by Professor Trelawney during the Spring '10 term at Colby-Sawyer.
- Spring '10
- US History