cummings_response

cummings_response - Steven Delaney Cummings Response...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Steven Delaney Cummings Response 2-15-2011 In this article Cummings discusses genetically modified organisms and their background as well as ethical issues. She seems to think genetic modification is a type of trespassing on nature in the fact that the organism itself is not willing and accepting to the modification. There are many questions brought up by people regarding these types of foods. People seem to not want their food modified, even if they cannot tell the difference in many cases. Cummings begins the article speaking of genetic engineering and its role in modifying organisms, namely food. Everyone seems to eat genetically modified food on a regular basis, but how modified actually is it? Cummings looks at genes and DNA as fairly new technology in the scheme of things, and how new genetic modification truly is. Cummings then discusses why there seems to be no monitoring or safety studies about genetically modified food. That is the policy drawn up and agreed upon that the food companies would not tell the government of their problems with their products, and...
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

cummings_response - Steven Delaney Cummings Response...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online