ajaz_eco204_2009_chapter_2.4.1

ajaz_eco204_2009_chapter_2.4.1 - University of Toronto...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
University of Toronto, Department of Economics, ECO 204 2009 2010 S. Ajaz Hussain ECO 204 2009 2010 S. Ajaz Hussain (Draft) Chapter 2.4.1: Modeling Consumer Choice, Applications 1 Please help improve the course by sending me an e mail about typos or suggestions for improvements Section #s continue from chapter 2.3 2. UMP: Perfect Substitutes (Linear) Utility Function Do you perceive differences in gasoline brands? Do you think Shell and Esso gasoline are imperfect substitutes? If so, your preferences may be modeled by a Cobb Douglas utility function (review chapter 2.3 ). But what if you perceive gasoline brands as a “commodity”, i.e. you perceive all gasoline brands to be the same? In this case, your optimal choice may be modeled by the perfect substitutes (linear) utility function. We will set up and solve the perfect substitutes UMP followed by an analysis of optimal choices and business applications. 2.1 Optimal Solution and Utility A utility function with a constant MRS is labeled a “perfect substitutes” utility function. A common misconception is that “perfect substitutes” means the consumer perceives good to be identical . Here are two examples: Example Suppose a consumer has the utility function ܷൌܳ ൅ 2ܳ . The ܯܴܵ ൌ െ1/2 means the consumer perceives a ½ unit of good 2 to be perfe able w good 1. ctly substitut ith a unit of Example Suppose a consumer has the utility function ൅ ܳ . The ܯܴܵ ൌ െ1 means the consumer perceives a unit of good 2 to be perfectly substitutable with a unit of good 1. That said, let’s see how to do the UMP for perfect substitutes (linear) utility function. For ܰൌ2 commodities, the UMP is: 1 Thanks: Ksenija Stupar 1 ECO 204 (Draft) Chapter 2.4.1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
University of Toronto, Department of Economics, ECO 204 2009 2010 S. Ajaz Hussain max ,ொ ߙܳ ject to ܲ ܳ ൅ ܲ ܳ ൑ܻ ߚܳ sub ߙ,ߚ can be any arbitrary numbers. If ߙ,ߚ ൐ 0 , the consumer has monotonic preferences 2 and will spend her entire inco U me. Hence, the MP is: max ,ொ ൅ ߚܳ subject to ܲ ܳ ܳ ൌܻ This is the same as: max ,ொ subject to ܲ ܳ ܳ െܻൌ0 Optimization problems with equality constraints are solved by the Lagrangean technique. Form the Lagrangean: max ,ொ ,ఒ ܮൌ ߙܳ െ ߣሾܲ ܳ ܳ െܻሿ The FOCs are 3 : ߲ܮ ߲ ൌߙെ ߣܲ ൌ0 ܳ ߲ܮ ൌߚെ ߣܲ ߲ܳ ߲ܮ ߲ߣ ൌܲ ܳ ܳ െ ܻൌ0 Now observe that if you divide the first and second FOCs, you get: ߣܲ ܲ ߙ ܲ ߚ ߣܲ 2 ௬௜௘௟ௗ௦ ሱۛۛۛሮ ߙ ܲ ߚ ܲ ௬௜௘௟ௗ௦ ሱۛۛۛሮെ ߙ ߚ ൌ െ ܲ ܲ 2 This is because her marginal utili ill be positive.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/02/2011 for the course ECO 204 taught by Professor Hussein during the Fall '08 term at University of Toronto.

Page1 / 35

ajaz_eco204_2009_chapter_2.4.1 - University of Toronto...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online