332mt1soln

332mt1soln - B U Department of Mathematics Spring 2006 Math...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: B U Department of Mathematics Spring 2006 Math 332 - Real Analysis II, First Midterm, 17/4/2006, 17:00-19:30 Whatever theorem, proposition, lemma you use, Full Name : you must be sure that it is applicable. Student ID : Justify all your claims in your proofs. over 40 1. [5] For a function f : A ⊂ R m → B ⊂ R n and x ∈ A , fill in the blanks as precise as possible : Df ( x ) : R m → R n Df : A → L ( R m , R n ) D : set of diffble fncs → fncs from A to L ( R m , R n ) D 2 f ( x ) : R m × R m → R n D 2 f : A → bilinear fncs from R m × R m to R n 2. [1] Let I be the n × n identity matrix. What do we mean when we write Df ( x ) ´ = I ? Solution: LHS is a linear transformation while RHS is the corresponding matrix in standard bases. 3. Claim: Any continuous function f : [0 , 1] → [0 , 1] can be approximated by a contraction. (a) [4] Why cannot we use the Stone-Weierstrass theorem to prove this claim?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/04/2011 for the course MATH 321 taught by Professor Talinbudak during the Spring '11 term at BU.

Page1 / 2

332mt1soln - B U Department of Mathematics Spring 2006 Math...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online