Chapter 5

Chapter 5 - § 5 Hypothesis Testing § 5.1 Introduction...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: § 5 Hypothesis Testing § 5.1 Introduction 5.1.1 A parametric hypothesis H is an assertion about the unknown parameter θ in a parametric model. Example § 5.1.1 (i) Man’s height ∼ N ( μ M ,σ 2 ) Woman’s height ∼ N ( μ W ,σ 2 ) Parameter θ = ( μ M ,μ W ,σ ) H : μ M > μ W (i.e. men are on average taller than women); (ii) P (new medical treatment cures disease) = p P (old medical treatment cures disease) = q θ = ( p,q ) H : p > q (i.e. new treatment is more effective); (iii) stock market undergoes daily change X ∼ N (0 ,σ 2 ) when a political event occurs θ = σ H : σ > 1 (i.e. political event destabilizes the stock market); (iv) A chemical fertilizer is cheap but is potentially harmful to consumers. Outcome of a safety test = X ∼ N ( θ, 1) Acceptable safety standard requires θ < 1 H : θ < 1 (i.e. chemical is safe). 5.1.2 Formulation of hypotheses is subjective, depends on the practical situation as well as the attitude of the person who hypothesizes. 5.1.3 A statistical test of H is a data-based procedure for deciding whether the observed data contain evidence against H . 5.1.4 Sample data are random and may be misleading. Conclusions from hypothesis tests may not always produce the correct answer. Good tests have a bigger chance to give correct answers. 45 § 5.2 Hypotheses 5.2.1 Definition. X (data) ∼ p (probability function) A hypothesis test involves two hypotheses about p : 1. null hypothesis H — • conservative, i.e. not to be rejected unless evidence is strong, • usually takes the form of “no difference”, 2. alternative hypothesis H 1 — • specifies the kind of departure from H of interest to the tester, • preferred to H only if such departure is detected with strong evidence. Based on X , the test helps us assess the “relative” plausibility of H and H 1 . 5.2.2 Example § 5.1.1 (cont’d) (i) H : μ M = μ W (no difference) vs H 1 : μ M > μ W (men being taller). However, if one is only interested in whether men and women have different heights on average, the appropriate hypotheses should be H : μ M = μ W vs H 1 : μ M 6 = μ W . (ii) To protect patients, one might consider H : p = q (no difference) vs H 1 : p > q (new treatment more effective) , i.e. we would not recommend use of new treatment unless strong evidence exists in support of its effectiveness. (iii) H : σ ≤ 1 (small destabilizing effect) vs H 1 : σ > 1 (big destabilizing effect); (iv) To protect the farmer, one may wish to test H : θ < 1 vs H 1 : θ ≥ 1 , so that the cheap fertilizer will be abandoned only if there is strong evidence against its safety. To protect consumers, one may do the opposite, i.e. test H : θ ≥ 1 vs H 1 : θ < 1 , so that the cheap fertilizer will NOT be adopted unless there is strong evidence confirming its safety....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/04/2011 for the course STAT 1302 taught by Professor Smslee during the Spring '10 term at HKU.

Page1 / 35

Chapter 5 - § 5 Hypothesis Testing § 5.1 Introduction...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online