Unformatted text preview: khomeni induced his best outcome. I see how the payoff of 4 occurs regardless of whether or not Iran gets attacked by the US ( either way it serves khomeinis purpose, either he shores up strength quickly at home more by creating an external ally who has attacked iran or he does the same by reframing the debate as a revolution vs non revolutionary struggle and slowly defeats the US). Khomeini has a dominant strategy of obstruct and carter had a dominant strategy of negotiate over intervene. My question is : does this ability to unilaterely control the outcome amount to moving or threat power?...
View Full Document
- Spring '11
- Game Theory, Dominant strategy, 25th Game theory, non revolutionary struggle