This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: had the stories changed over time? This chapter discusses the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. It points out the similarities and differences in the stories they tell. It talks about how they all give a very similar account of Jesus life, his birth, his deeds, his teachings, and his death. My question is why did they include all four books? It basically says the same story four different times. This really bugs me. Could they not get their point across the first time? It said the main difference between the first three books was the stories they told and how some were elaborated more in one book than another. Is it really that important? If so, why couldnt the church cut and paste different parts so everything was included while having the story of Jesus life only told once?...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 05/06/2011 for the course THEOLOGY 220 taught by Professor Nichols during the Spring '11 term at Saint Louis.
- Spring '11
- The Bible