Theo ch 12 - N T T H EO 220-02 Ch 12 The Quest for the H...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: N T T H EO 220-02 Ch 12 The Quest for the H istorical Jesus What I found in teresting in this chapter were the general agreements about t he historical Jesus. You would think that scholars would be more likely to accept favorable things. For instance, i t looks better on the Church and i ts followers if Jesus actually performed all the miracles mentioned in the text, and not just f iguratively. In contrast, the things they claim that are actually t rue are ones that defame Jesus and deter people from thinking he is worthy of following. Scholars agree that Jesus befriended sinners, was an outcast, and had a reputation as a g lutton and a drinker. I t makes sense that they gave these things credibili ty because i t does not make sense for a believer to make this stuff up about Jesus. However, i t also seems like something they would want to discredit for the sake of Jesus’ divine image. I would like to talk more about the ideas of the European rationalists. For example, Hermann Samuel Reimarus claims that Christianity is based on a double m isrepresentation, and Schweitzer’s Jesus is a devout yet misguided apocalyptist. T hese theories do not seem entirely dismissible. The answer to a lot of theological questions about things that sound too good to be t rue are, “you just have to have faith and believe” or “it’s just a story or a metaphor to prove a point.” These r ationales are just as absurd to a non-believer as the above ideas are to Christians. M y question is who were the members of the Jesus Seminar? How were they chosen or was it a thing you can sign up for? What made these scholars specifically qualified for this undertaking of the New Testament? I wish the book would have g iven more detail so that I could feel more reasonably assured by their i nterpretations of things. ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/06/2011 for the course THEOLOGY 220 taught by Professor Nichols during the Spring '11 term at Saint Louis.

Page1 / 2

Theo ch 12 - N T T H EO 220-02 Ch 12 The Quest for the H...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online