Socio-exam 5 - Marry Beneche-exam 5 1 Do you resonate more with Gemeinschaft or Gesellschaft and why Ferdinand utilizes the expressions

Socio-exam 5 - Marry Beneche-exam 5 1 Do you resonate...

This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 6 pages.

Marry Beneche-exam 5 1. Do you resonate more with Gemeinschaft or Gesellschaft, and why? Ferdinand utilizes the expressions Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft to describe two dissimilar society’s organization. I individually amplify more with Gemeinschaft which mean community than with Gesellschaft known as society. Each one of them has their own advantages, but eventually, I find Gemeinschaft a bit more intimate and compelling. Gemeinschaft is more connected with neighborhoods and communities, and the most substantial organizations within the town’s society are seems as an immense family. Identification and kinship with the gemeinschaft are hereticated; farther giving to its genetical domesticity and characteristics. Strangers in the gemeinschaft are not effortlessly integrated, seldom becoming participants of the community. The cultural currency in gemeinschaft is your engagement in the usual recognition of the community. An example are traditions. All of these ideas are comfortable and familiar because I grew up in this type of organization through a community that’s religious. Traditions, common identity, shared values and morals, and relationship join the gemeinschaft people together and it maintains each other accountable. When each member individually connects with one another, they evolve a sense of responsibility and obligation to secure and preserve the culture as well as the people that characterize the gemeinschaft and themselves. As the society’s population of the gemeinschaft increases, it may be steadily put back by a further gesellschaft structure. A bigger population entails a substantial width of labor in a way to help the society, engendering adeptness in the process. The collective currency is not shared
morally, but farther worth of labor. Everybody is collectively dependent on one another’s ability to interchange business and labor. That way, capital wealth and money suit the only defining predictable in the midst of people. Ferdinand seems to have a negative perspective of gesellschaft. He postulates that gemeinschaft, the distinctive traits describing folk and the folklife culture are preserved and treasured. According to Ferdinand, the gesellschaft carry folk culture and folklife in contempt, causing instead an everlasting veiled hostility and an isolation’s culture. The cultured people, the upper strata and the rich are the ones he described as living.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture