5 - Draft Text: 1. Would you have been long or short on...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Draft Text: 1. Would you have been long or short on Blockbuster stock at the time of the case? How about Netflix? Why? In January 2007, the Netflix’s case was addressed and analyzed by Harvard Business School. In my opinion, I would have been short on Blockbuster Stock because Blockbuster [POSSESSIVE FORM] business was out of touch with industry trends. Their model of in-store DVD rentals was inconvenient and their late fee charges were a major source of client dissatisfaction. The store had a complicated membership situation (you had to have a membership to rent and when you applied for a membership you had to provide all of your personal information) that made it difficult for customers. Moreover customers were frustrated by the fact that they would often go to the store to look for a specific new release (the core focus of the company) and find that all of the DVDs had run out of stock. Even when Blockbuster offered an on-line service to compete with Netflix [COMMA AFTER DEP. CLAUSE] they were too late to compete with Netflix [POSSESSIVE FORM] online customer base. Having an on-line and an in-store account was confusing to most consumers. Also, Blockbuster’s core competency
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/18/2011 for the course MATH 40 taught by Professor Clark during the Spring '11 term at Golden Gate.

Page1 / 2

5 - Draft Text: 1. Would you have been long or short on...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online