{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

sm_ch16

# Water Resources Engineering

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 16 – 1 Chapter 16 16.1.1. L = 100 m, n = 0.4, S = 0.02 m/m, T = 10 years, in SI units, K = 26.285 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 c i 38 . 777 (0.02) i (0.4) ) 26.285(100 S i n KL t in seconds. 0.4 c i 96 . 12 t in minutes Assume i, then compute t c and compare t c to t D (since t c = t D is assumed) from the IDF curve at T = 10 years. If both are not equal (close), take t D = t c and determine i. Using this value of i, determine a new t c . Repeat this process until t D = t c . The result of such a computation is shown in tabular form below. Assumed i (m/hr) Assumed i (in/hr) t D from IDF curve (min) Computed t c (min) 0.025 0.043 0.050 1.0 1.7 1.97 120 54 43 56.66 45.61 42.94 Thus, i = 1.97 in/hr is OK. t c = 43 minutes. 16.1.2. L = 200 m, n = 0.01, S = 0.003 m/m, design frequency = 10 years, K = 26.285 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 c i 61 . 227 (0.003) i (0.01) ) 26.285(200 S i n KL t in seconds. 0.4 c i 79 . 3 t in minutes, i in m/hr. This problem is solved in a similar way as problem 16.1.1. The result is given in the following table. Assumed i (m/hr) Assumed i (in/hr) t D from IDF curve (min) Computed t c (min) 0.050 0.107 0.117 0.119 2.0 4.2 4.6 4.7 43.0 12.6 9.3 8.9 12.6 9.3 8.9 8.9 Thus, t c = 43 minutes, for which i = 0.119 m/hr = 119 mm/hr. 16.1.3. L = 200 ft, n = 0.10, S = 0.005 ft/ft, design frequency = 25 years, K = 56 Duration-intensity data: Duration (min) 5 10 25 30 60 Rainfall intensity (in/hr) 7.3 5.7 4.8 3.3 2.1 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 c i 21 . 1656 (0.005) i (0.10) 56(200) S i n KL t in seconds. 16 – 2 0.4 c i 60 . 27 t in minutes, i in in/hr. This problem is solved in a similar way as problems 16.1.1 and 16.1.2. The duration-rainfall intensity relationship is first plotted on a log-log graph paper as shown. The computation result is given in the following table. Intensity-duration curve for Colorado Springs (T = 25 years) 1 10 1 10 100 Duration (min) Intensity (in/hr) Assumed i (in/hr) t D from IDF curve (min) Computed t c (min) 3.0 4.5 4.6 35.0 17.8 15.1 17.8 15.1 15.0 Thus, t c = 15.0 minutes, for which i = 0.119 m/hr = 4.6 in/hr. 16.1.4. L = 400 ft, n = 0.45, ¡ ¢ 77 . D 12 t 57 i £ , S = 0.01 ft/ft Thus, ¡ ¢ 3 . 4 . 77 . D 6 . 6 . c ) 01 . ( 12 t 57 ) 45 . ( ) 400 ( 56 t » ¼ º « ¬ ª £ = 997.70(t D + 12) 0.31 (in seconds) t c = 16.63(t D + 12) 0.31 (in minutes) This equation can be solved iteratively, in essence, in a similar way to the solutions to problems 16.1.1 – 16.1.3. Assume t D value and compute t c , then let the new t D value equal to the computed t c value. Doing so results in t c = 63.6 min after a few iterations. 16.1.5. L = 500 ft, B = 32 ft, S = 0.005 ft/ft, n = 0.016, C = 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 c i 76 . 955 (0.005) i (0.016) 56(500) S i n KL t in seconds....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 24

sm_ch16 - 16 – 1.1.1 L = 100 m n = 0.4 S = 0.02 m/m T =...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online