Bioethics - Txt: Necessary is if not x, then not y...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Introduction to Moral Theory Moral Theory Meta:Ethics Conceptual analysis Clarification, giving necessary/sufficient conditions of claims father to child is necs and bmw to car suff Correct Method of moral reasoning NOT: statement of personal preference or typical preference (statistical facts), not sufficient to appeal to moral authority-needs justification/backing, don’t take authority/ existence of God for granted IS: conceptual clarity, information, rational-observe logical rules, impartiality-apply equally to all ppl, relevant dissimilar treated dissimilarly and relevant similar similarly. Justification for treating diff, moral principals.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Txt: Necessary is if not x, then not y Sufficient is if a, then y Recitation August 28, 2009 Peter Singer's Argument: Premise 1: Suffering and death from dire poverty are bad. Premise 2: If we can prevent something bad from occurring w/o sacrificing something of comparable moral significance, then we ought to do so. Premise 3: We can prevent suffering and death from dire poverty w/o sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance Conclusion: We ought to do so! Anthony Tiberio Caldwell 107A Tuesday 11-1 and Thurs 11-12 Anonymous email
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/23/2011 for the course PHIL 165 taught by Professor Gradstudent during the Fall '07 term at UNC.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online