Bioethics 6

Bioethics 6 - 1 Mere Desires 2 Judging that something is...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1. Mere Desires 2. Judging that something is good 3. Caring about somebody Payment for organs Arguments for Arguments against Libertarian Empirical Consequentialist Futile Decrease altruistic donation/ decrease donation overall Ethical Fairness/equality Coercion/exploitation Commedation "Commonfiction is Objectonable" Demeaning? Yes No Are there grounds for Moral Prohibition? Legal Prohibition? Equality Priority- for more disadvantaged 1. All humans deserve equal moral consideration. 2. If humans deserve equal moral cons., then sentience confers moral consideration. 4. Non-human animals are sentient. Three options 1. Agree with singer 2. Deny all humans being equal In place of sentience: Rationality, self-awarness ( 1 is false), 3. Group-membership is important- try to show non-arbitrary being part of a group (species) why? Arbitrary
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/23/2011 for the course PHIL 165 taught by Professor Gradstudent during the Fall '07 term at UNC.

Page1 / 2

Bioethics 6 - 1 Mere Desires 2 Judging that something is...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online