PHI 102-01: Grading Rubric for Second Written Paper Assignment (Winter 2011)Excellent (5)Good (4)Fair (3)Unacceptable (1)Philosophical QualityAddresses a philosophically important topic and does so in a competent and interesting manner.Addresses a philosophically important topic, but does so in a formulaic manner.Addresses a philosophically important topic, but does so without demonstrating an adequate understanding of that topic.Does not address any philosophically important topic.Content DevelopmentEffectively defines the scope of paper’s topic. Effectively determines key philosophical terms and defines them well.Thoroughly analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.Defines scope of paper’s topic adequately. Identifies key philosophical concepts and defines them adequately.Identifies own and others’ assumptions and mentions the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.
This is the end of the preview.
access the rest of the document.