Grading rubric for second paper (PHI 102-01)

Grading rubric for second paper (PHI 102-01) - PHI 102-01:...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
PHI 102-01: Grading Rubric for Second Written Paper Assignment (Winter 2011) Excellent (5) Good (4) Fair (3) Unacceptable (1) Philosophical Quality Addresses a philosophically important topic and does so in a competent and interesting manner. Addresses a philosophically important topic, but does so in a formulaic manner. Addresses a philosophically important topic, but does so without demonstrating an adequate understanding of that topic. Does not address any philosophically important topic. Content Development Effectively defines the scope of paper’s topic. Effectively determines key philosophical terms and defines them well. Thoroughly analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Defines scope of paper’s topic adequately. Identifies key philosophical concepts and defines them adequately. Identifies own and others’ assumptions and mentions the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Defines scope of paper’s
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/25/2011 for the course PHI 102 taught by Professor Castelao-lawless during the Winter '07 term at Grand Valley State University.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online