Neil Gonzales, ACCT 470-V2WW, Assignment 2-4 Final

Neil Gonzales, ACCT 470-V2WW, Assignment 2-4 Final - Neil...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Neil Gonzales Assignment 2-4 Auditing Ethical Dilemmas 20 points Due: May 15 Chapter 19: Problem 19-28. P. 677 Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the AICPA’s Code of Professional Conduct, rule 101. Indicate whether each situation violates the Code. If it violates the Code, explain why. Under Rule 101, it was defined as “a member in public practice shall be independent in the performance of professional services as required by standards promulgated by bodies designated a. Julia Roberto, a sole practitioner, has provided advisory services for her audit client, Leather Ltd. She interpreted financial statements, provided forecasts and other analysis, counseled on partial expansion plans, and counseled on banking relationships but has not made any management decisions. Leather is a privately held entity. P. 652 a. Under the AICPA’s Code of Professional Conduct, rule 101, the situation does not violate this ruling
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/25/2011 for the course ACCT 420 taught by Professor Fidler during the Winter '08 term at Franklin.

Page1 / 2

Neil Gonzales, ACCT 470-V2WW, Assignment 2-4 Final - Neil...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online