Electoral Realignments

Electoral Realignments - Annu Rev Polit Sci 2000 3:449–74...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2000. 3:449–74 Copyright c 2000 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved E LECTORAL R EALIGNMENTS David R. Mayhew Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-830l; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words realignments, critical elections, presidential elections, cyclical theories ■ Abstract American electoral realignment theory, as constructed in its classic form chie¡y by Key, Schattschneider, Sundquist, and Burnham, can be sorted into 11distinctempiricalclaims. Thesepertaintodichotomizationofelectiontypes,period- icity, a cyclical dynamic, high voter turnout, durable new issue cleavages, ideologized elections, nationalization of issues, major changes in government policy, redistributive policy, effectiveandconsequentialvotervoice, andthe“systemof1896.” Theseclaims are assessed for their empirical validity and illuminative power. INTRODUCTION ThestudyofUSelectoralrealignments, whichenjoyeditsheydayinthe1960sand 1970s, was one of the most creative, engaging, and in¡uential intellectual enter- prises undertaken by American political scientists during the last half century. It rivaled the Michigan election studies. It offered certi¢able science, in the sense of a conceptual scheme, a theory, and quantitative analysis; breadth, in tackling large political questions associated with all of American national history; and even an eschatology, in the sense that it has induced generations of students and others, armedwithakeytohistoricaldevelopment,tokeepasking,“Isanelectoralrealign- ment about to happen?” or “Have we been witnessing an electoral realignment this year?” Fundamental to the appeal and in¡uence of the realignments enterprise was the talent of four major entrepreneurs during its creative early days. First came Key and Schattschneider, who contributed important groundwork, and then Sundquist andBurnham,whoprovidedtheprincipalstatementsinthegenre. Allfourofthese writers exhibited a prodigious, sure-footed command of the factual particulars of American political history as well as a rare capacity to generalize by detecting patterns. Small wonder that the genre made such a mark. Here I address what might be called the classic phase of the realignments genre, which means chie¡y works by these four writers. I touch on subsequent claims by Brady; I take up critical commentaries by the trio of Clubb, Flanigan, and Zingale, and by Bartels; and I refer to a few works outside the genre, but I do not address 1094-2939/00/0623-0449$14.00 449 A n n u . R e v . P o l i t . S c i . 2 . 3 : 4 4 9- 4 7 4 . D o w n l o a d e d f r o m w w w . a n n u a l r e v i e w s . o r g b y F l o r i d a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y o n 1 / 1 3 / 1 . F o r p e r s o n a l u s e o n l y . ?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/27/2011 for the course POS 5208 taught by Professor Dr.wright during the Fall '10 term at Florida A&M.

Page1 / 27

Electoral Realignments - Annu Rev Polit Sci 2000 3:449–74...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online