Final Exam Review 2

Final Exam Review 2 - Part II Problems with the ergon argument Aristotles view that ones function(ergon should focus on what one is best at(most

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Part II – Problems with the ergon argument: Aristotle’s view that one’s function (ergon) should focus on what one is best at (most excellent at …and this for humans is the supreme human good, aka using reason), is limiting. It assumes, like cookie cutters, that we’re all trying to reach the same function and that we’re all best at reason (SHG---each individual uses their own reason in determining their best natural talent and must stick with what they’re good at). Very regimented What if you don’t like doing what you’re naturally best at? Why can’t you determine yourself what you want to do? Choice? Enjoyment? Sense of importance? Also, Aristotle doesn’t distinguish between “good at” “good for” and “morally good” when defining SHG o Eg; robbing banks: good at? Yes. Good for? No. morally good? No. AND SHG is not enough o Need: family, friends, power, shelter, food, beauty, etc. Just ONE SHG? Why can’t you change your SHG over time or have more than one thing
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/31/2011 for the course PHIL 210 taught by Professor Rheins during the Spring '11 term at UNC.

Page1 / 2

Final Exam Review 2 - Part II Problems with the ergon argument Aristotles view that ones function(ergon should focus on what one is best at(most

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online