CS Lewis Theories of Myth

CS Lewis Theories of Myth - 1. [A myth] is extra-literary....

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1. “[A myth] is… extra-literary. Those who have got at the same myth through Natalis Comes, Lemprière, Kingsley, Hawthorne, Robert Graves, or Roger Green, have a mythical experience in common; and it is important, not merely an H.C.F. In contrast to this, those who have got the same story from Brook’s Romeus and Shakespeare’s Romeo share a mere H.C.F., in itself valueless.” 2. “The pleasure of myth depends hardly at all on such usual narrative attractions as suspense or surprise. Even at a first hearing it is felt to be inevitable. And the first hearing is chiefly valuable in introducing us to a permanent object of contemplation—more like a thing than a narration—which works upon us by its peculiar flavor or quality, rather as a smell or a chord does. Sometimes, even from the first, there is hardly any narrative element. The idea that the gods, and all good men, live under the shadow of Ragnarok is hardly a story. The Hesperides, with their apple-tree and dragon, are already a potent
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/31/2011 for the course CLAS 131 taught by Professor James during the Fall '07 term at UNC.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online