CM105 Week 8 Peer Jennifer Fullhart Review by Joey D. Finley Form

CM105 Week 8 Peer Jennifer Fullhart Review by Joey D. Finley Form

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Peer Review Form For Jennifer Fullhart Please respond to the following questions in complete sentences. If the answer to a question is “yes,” explain why. If the answer to a question is “no,” give specific suggestions and examples for how to fix the element being discussed. Remember that both tact and honesty are important to every peer review. How you make a statement is just as important as the statement itself. 1. Were all parts of the subject covered in the in the presentation, or were any left out? Explain. a. Not sure. The intro implies that the PPT will offer both sides of home and traditional school. Perhaps re make intro/thesis to declare the one is in fact better than the other. With Jennifer’s PPT it would seem that home schooling is better. 2. Were appropriate headings used for each of the main points of the presentation? a. No. Each slide had points, but the Intro and title page were the only discernable pages with headings. Slide 4 still has “Click to add title”. Needs to be replaced or deleted.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/31/2011 for the course CM 105 taught by Professor Klipsch during the Spring '09 term at Kaplan University.

Page1 / 2

CM105 Week 8 Peer Jennifer Fullhart Review by Joey D. Finley Form

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online