Transformational_leadership_school_improvement_Chapter4_Part6.docx - The current research made use of four items each for attributes for conduct for

Transformational_leadership_school_improvement_Chapter4_Part6.docx

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 4 pages.

The current research made use of four items each for attributes, for conduct, for stimulating motivation, intelligent stimulation and finally for modified thought. On the other hand, the Transactional leadership Style includes only three subdimensions of depending reward, management-by-exception (active) and management-by-exception (passive). Accordingly, four substances were used for each sub-dimension. Lastly, the laissez- faire managerial ability has one single subdimension which is Laissez-Faire. Also, four items were used for laissez-faire. Table 4.9 shows the number of items for each sub-dimension. The findings from the exploratory factor analysis regarding managerial ability are offered in in Table 4.10. The Table includes of the factor loadings of nine sub-dimensions of managerial items after every process showing either low factor loading (< .50) or double loading; the consequences showed that all items loadings range from .40 to .90 Table 4.10 below indicates that the percentage of variance explained in & is 56.47%, KMO degree for managerial ability is .724 which designates an adequate high level that is suitable to be used in the factor analysis (Hair, et al., 2006). Bartlett Sphericity’s Rate for the examination is large (1618.65) with a difference of 190 and an important level of .000. Both KMO amount and Bartlett test of sphericity consequences designate that the items used fulfilled the necessities for the factor examination, hence, suggesting that factor analysis could be made appropriate to the managerial ability’s substances. The researcher conducted factor examination
Image of page 1
Image of page 2

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture