The current research made use of four items each for attributes, for conduct, for
stimulating motivation, intelligent stimulation and finally for modified thought. On
the other hand, the Transactional leadership Style includes only three subdimensions of
depending reward, management-by-exception (active) and
management-by-exception
(passive). Accordingly, four substances were used for
each sub-dimension. Lastly, the laissez-
faire managerial ability has one single subdimension which is Laissez-Faire. Also, four items
were used for laissez-faire.
Table 4.9 shows the number of items for each sub-dimension. The findings from the
exploratory factor analysis regarding managerial ability are offered in in Table 4.10.
The Table includes of the factor loadings of nine sub-dimensions of managerial
items after every process showing either low factor loading (< .50) or double
loading; the consequences showed that all items loadings range from .40 to .90
Table 4.10 below indicates that the percentage of variance explained in & is 56.47%,
KMO degree for managerial ability is .724 which designates an adequate high level
that is suitable to be used in the factor analysis (Hair, et al., 2006). Bartlett
Sphericity’s Rate for the examination is large (1618.65) with a difference of 190 and
an important level of .000. Both KMO amount and Bartlett test of sphericity consequences
designate that the items used fulfilled the necessities for the factor
examination, hence, suggesting that factor analysis could be made appropriate to the
managerial ability’s substances. The researcher conducted factor examination
