This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: lawsuit? Holding: Trial case was reversed, Judgment for the Appellant Parajon. A new trial is remanded. Reasoning: Three criteria were fulfilled, thus determining that Bergs nondisclosure warranted a new trial: 1. Bergs nondisclosure was material because it precluded counsels ability to question her about the experience in order to fairly evaluate her as a prospective juror. 2. The record shows Bergs concealed her personal injury from counsel during question. With her being a lawyer, its hard to imagine that she did not think the question applied to her. 3. Other prospective jurors understood the information the counsel was asking them to disclose. Therefore, counsel made a diligent inquiry....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/05/2011 for the course ACCT 323 taught by Professor Eubanks during the Spring '11 term at Athens University of Econ and Bus.
- Spring '11