{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

rpp2010-list-J-psi-1S - Citation K Nakamura et al(Particle...

Info icon This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) J/(1S) I G (J PC ) = 0- (1 - - ) J/(1S) MASS VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 3096.916 0.011 OUR AVERAGE 3096.917 0.010 0.007 AULCHENKO 03 KEDR 1 ARTAMONOV 00 OLYA 3096.89 0.09 502 2 ARMSTRONG 93B E760 3096.91 0.03 0.01 3096.95 0.1 0.3 193 BAGLIN 87 SPEC We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 3097.5 3098.4 0.3 2.0 38k GRIBUSHIN LEMOIGNE 96 82 FMPS GOLI 3 ZHOLENTZ 3096.93 0.09 502 80 REDE 4 BRANDELIK 79C DASP 3097.0 1 1 Reanalysis of ZHOLENTZ 80 using new electron mass (COHEN 87) and radiative corrections (KURAEV 85). 2 Mass central value and systematic error recalculated by us according to Eq. (16) in ARMSTRONG 93B, using the value for the (2S) mass from AULCHENKO 03. 3 Superseded by ARTAMONOV 00. 4 From a simultaneous fit to e + e - , + - and hadronic channels assuming (e + e - ) = (+ - ). e + e - hadrons e + e - hadrons p p e+ e- p p e+ e- X 515 - Be 2 X 185 - Be + - A + e- e e+ e- J/(1S) WIDTH VALUE (keV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 92.9 2.8 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.1. 5 ADAMS 96.1 3.2 13k 06A CLEO e + e - + - e+ e- 84.4 8.9 BAI 95B BES 6 ARMSTRONG 93B E760 p p e + e - 91 11 6 6.1 7 HSUEH 85.5 + 5.8 92 RVUE See mini-review - We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 8 ANASHIN 94.1 2.7 10 KEDR 3.097 e + e - e + e - , + - 5 AUBERT 93.7 3.5 7.8k 04 BABR e + e - + - 5 Calculated by us from the reported values of (e + e - )B(+ - ) using B(e + e - ) = (5.94 0.06)% and B(+ - ) = (5.93 0.06)%. 6 The initial-state radiation correction reevaluated by ANDREOTTI 07 in its Ref. [4]. 7 Using data from COFFMAN 92, BALDINI-CELIO 75, BOYARSKI 75, ESPOSITO 75B, BRANDELIK 79C. 8 Assuming (e + e - ) = (+ - ) and using (e + e - )/ total = (5.94 0.06)%. HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 1 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) J/(1S) DECAY MODES Mode Fraction (i /) (87.7 (64.1 ( 8.8 0.5 1.0 0.5 )% )% )% (13.50 0.30 ) % Scale factor/ Confidence level 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 hadrons virtual hadrons ggg g g + e- e + - 0 0 a2 (1320) + + - - + - 0 + - f2 (1270) K (892)0 K (1430)0 + c.c. 2 K (892)0 K 2 (1770)0 + c.c. K (892)0 K - + + c.c. K (892)K + c.c. K + K (892)- + c.c. K + K (892)- + c.c. K + K - 0 + K (892)- + c.c. K K 0 K 0 K (892)0 + c.c. K K 0 K (892)0 + c.c. K 0 K K1 (1400) K K (892)0 K + - + c.c. 0 0 b1 (1235) K K 0 S b1 (1235)0 0 K K 0 S K (892)K + c.c. K K f0 (1710) K K 2( + - ) (1232)++ p - K K Page 2 ( 5.94 0.06 ) % ( 5.93 0.06 ) % Decays involving hadronic resonances ( 1.69 0.15 ) % ( 5.6 0.7 ) 10-3 ( 1.09 0.22 ) % ( 8.5 ( 4.0 ( 8.6 ( 4.3 ( 6.0 ( 6.9 ( 6.1 3.4 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.9 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 S=2.4 ) 10-3 S=1.1 ) 10-3 ) 10-4 ) 10-3 ( 5.12 0.30 ) 10-3 ( 1.97 0.20 ) 10-3 0.4 ) 10-3 ( 3.0 ( 4.39 0.31 ) 10-3 ( 3.2 0.4 ) 10-3 ( 3.8 seen [a] [a] [a] ( 3.4 ( 3.0 ( 3.4 ( 2.3 ( 2.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 1.4 ) 10-3 ( 2.18 0.23 ) 10-3 ( 1.6 0.5 ) 10-4 ( 4.8 1.1 ) 10-4 ( 1.66 0.23 ) 10-3 ( 1.6 0.5 ) 10-3 ( 1.74 0.20 ) 10-3 ( 1.83 0.24 ) 10-3 S=1.6 S=1.5 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 f0 (1710) K K (1232)++ (1232)-- (1385)- (1385)+ (or c.c.) f 2 (1525) + - 0 0 K K 0 S f1 (1420) 00 (1530)- + p K - (1385)0 0 (958) f0 (980) f0 (980) + - f0 (980) 0 0 (1530)0 0 (1385)- + (or c.c.) f1 (1285) + - (958) f0 (980) (958) a2 (1320) K K (1430)+ c.c. 2 K1 (1270) K K (1430)0 K (1430)0 2 2 K (892)0 K (892)0 f2 (1270) (1405) f 2 (1525) (1385)0 (1232)+ p (1540)(1540) K 0 p K - n + c.c. S (1540)K - n K 0 p K - n S (1540)K 0 p K 0 p K + n S S (1540)K + n K 0 p K + n S (1540)K 0 p K 0 p K - n S S 0 0 Page 3 [a] ) 10-4 ( 1.10 0.29 ) 10-3 ( 1.03 0.13 ) 10-3 ( 8 4 ) 10-4 ( 3.6 0.6 ( 8.7 0.8 1.6 0.8 2.4 0.8 ( 5.6 ( 7.2 ( 6.8 ( 7.5 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 S=2.7 [a] ) 10-4 ( 1.20 0.24 ) 10-3 ( 5.9 1.5 ) 10-4 ( 5.1 3.2 ) 10-4 ( 4.5 0.5 ) 10-4 ( 4.0 0.7 ) 10-4 ( 3.2 ( 2.2 ( 1.7 ( 3.2 [a] ( 3.1 ( 2.6 0.9 0.4 0.7 1.4 0.5 0.5 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 S=1.5 S=1.4 S=2.1 S=1.9 ( 4.0 1.7 ) 10-4 ( 1.93 0.23 ) 10-4 ( 1.82 0.21 ) 10-4 ( 1.4 0.5 ) 10-4 ( 1.05 0.18 ) 10-4 [a] < 4.3 < 4.0 < 3.0 < 2.9 ( 2.3 ( 7.2 < 2.5 < 2.2 < 2 < 1 < 1.1 < 2.1 < 1.6 < 5.6 < 1.1 < 9 < 6.4 0.7 1.3 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 S=1.1 10-3 10-3 10-3 10-3 CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% ) 10-4 ) 10-4 10-4 10-4 10-5 10-4 10-4 CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% 10-5 10-5 10-5 10-5 10-5 10-6 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 2( + - ) 0 Decays into stable hadrons ( 5.5 ( 2.9 0.4 0.6 )% )% S=1.6 3( + - ) 0 + - 0 + - 0 K + K - 4( + - ) 0 + - K + K - + - K + K - 0 0 K + K - f0 (980) + - KK 2( + - ) 3( + - ) 2( + - 0 ) 2( + - ) 3( + - ) pp p p 0 p p + - p p + - 0 pp pp pp p p (958) pp nn n n + - +- 00 2( + - ) K + K - p n - n N(1440) n N(1520) n N(1535) -+ - + (or c.c.) pK- 2(K + K - ) pK-0 K+K- K0 K0 S L 0 Page 4 ( 2.07 0.12 ) % ( 1.94 0.15 ) % ( 9.0 ( 6.6 3.0 0.5 ( 6.1 1.0 ) 10-3 ( 3.55 0.23 ) 10-3 ( 4.3 0.4 ) 10-3 ( 1.61 0.21 ) % ( 2.29 0.24 ) 10-3 ( 7.2 1.5 ) 10-4 ( 1.84 0.28 ) 10-3 ( 2.45 0.31 ) 10-3 ( 3.2 1.0 ) 10-4 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 [b] ( 2.00 0.12 ) 10-3 < 3.1 10-4 ( 1.10 0.15 ) 10-3 ( 2.1 0.4 ) 10-4 ( 4.5 ( 2.2 ( 4 1.5 0.4 4 ) 10-5 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 ( 2.17 0.07 ) 10-3 ( 1.19 0.08 ) 10-3 ( 6.0 0.5 ) 10-3 ( 2.3 0.9 ) 10-3 S=1.1 S=1.3 S=1.9 CL=90% S=1.3 ( 2.12 0.09 ) 10-3 seen seen seen ( 1.50 0.24 ) 10-3 ( 1.29 0.09 ) 10-3 ( 5.0 0.5 ) 10-3 [a] ( 8.5 1.6 ) 10-4 ( 1.61 0.15 ) 10-3 ( 8.3 0.7 ) 10-4 ( 8.9 ( 7.6 1.6 0.9 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 S=1.5 S=1.9 S=1.2 ( 2.9 0.8 ) 10-4 ( 2.37 0.31 ) 10-4 ( 1.46 0.26 ) 10-4 ( 2.6 < 6.4 0.7 ) 10-4 10-5 S=2.7 CL=90% HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 150 151 152 153 154 155 n K 0 + c.c. S + - + c.c. K0 K0 S S 3 4 5 c (1S) c (1S) 3 + - 2 0 2 (1870) + - (1405/1475) K K (1405/1475) 0 (1405/1475) + - (1405/1475) (958) 2 + 2 - f2 (1270)f2 (1270) f2 (1270)f2 (1270)(non resonant) + K - + - K f4 (2050) (1405/1475) 0 0 f2 (1270) f0 (1710) f0 (1710) f1 (1420) f1 (1285) f1 (1510) K K + - ) 10-4 ( 1.47 0.23 ) 10-4 < 1.5 10-4 < 1 10-6 ( 6.5 1.1 CL=90% CL=95% Radiative decays ( 1.2 < 9 < 1.5 ( 1.7 ( 1.2 ( 8.3 ( 6.1 ( 6.2 [c] ( 2.8 ( 7.8 ( 3.0 < 8.2 ( 4.5 < 5.4 < 8.8 0.8 0.4 + 2.7 - 1.1 3.1 1.0 2.4 0.6 2.0 0.5 0.4 ) 10-5 10-6 10-5 )% ) 10-6 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 ) 10-4 CL=90% CL=90% S=1.6 ) 10-3 ) 10-5 ) 10-4 10-5 S=1.6 S=1.8 CL=95% CL=90% CL=90% S=1.9 10-5 ( 5.28 0.15 ) 10-3 ( 2.8 0.5 ) 10-3 ( 9.5 1.7 ) 10-4 ( 8.2 ( 2.1 ( 2.7 1.9 0.6 0.7 ) 10-4 ) 10-3 10-4 ( 1.61 0.33 ) 10-3 ( 1.7 0.4 ) 10-3 ( 1.43 0.11 ) 10-3 + 1.2 - 0.9 1.0 1.0 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ( 8.5 ( 4.0 ( 3.1 ) 10-4 ) 10-3 ) 10-3 S=1.3 149 f0 (1710) K K S=1.2 ( 1.104 0.034) 10-3 ( 7.9 1.3 ) 10-4 ( 6.1 ( 4.5 ( 4.5 ( 2.8 ( 2.0 ( 7.0 0.8 1.2 + 0.7 - 0.4 1.8 1.4 2.2 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 156 f 2 (1525) 157 f2 (1640) 158 f2 (1910) 159 f2 (1950) K (892)K (892) HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 5 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 K (892)K (892) pp (2225) (1760) 0 0 (1760) X (1835) (K K ) [J PC = 0 - + ] 0 p p + - f0 (2200) fJ (2220) fJ (2220) fJ (2220) K K fJ (2220) p p f0 (1500) e+ e- D - e + e + c.c. D 0 e + e - + c.c. D - e + e + c.c. s D - + + c.c. D 0 K 0 + c.c. D - + + c.c. s ( 4.0 ( 4.0 ( 3.8 ( 3.3 ( 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.5 0.9 ( 1.98 0.33 ) 10-3 ( 2.2 0.6 ) 10-4 ( 7 4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-4 ) 10-3 ) 10-4 S=2.1 ) 10-4 S=2.1 0.33 ( 3.49 + 0.30 ) 10-5 - < 7.9 10-4 < 1.3 10-4 > 2.50 ( 8 ( 8.1 ( 1.5 4 3.0 0.8 CL=90% CL=90% 10-3 CL=99.9% ) 10-5 ) 10-5 ) 10-5 ( 1.01 0.32 ) 10-4 ( 8.8 1.4 ) 10-3 10-5 10-5 10-5 10-5 10-4 10-4 Weak decays < 1.2 < 1.1 < 3.6 < 7.5 < 1.7 < 1.3 CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% Charge conjugation (C ), Parity (P), Lepton Family number (LF ) violating modes 184 185 186 187 e e C LF LF LF < 5 < 1.1 < 8.3 < 2.0 10-6 10-6 10-6 10-6 10-4 CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% CL=90% Other decays 188 invisible < 7 CL=90% [a] The value is for the sum of the charge states or particle/antiparticle states indicated. [b] Includes p p + - and excludes p p , p p , p p . [c] See the "Note on the (1405)" in the (1405) Particle Listings. HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 6 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) J/(1S) PARTIAL WIDTHS hadrons VALUE (keV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1 We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 74.1 8.1 BAI 95B BES e+ e- 59 24 BALDINI-... 75 FRAG e + e - 59 14 BOYARSKI 75 MRK1 e + e - 50 25 ESPOSITO 75B FRAM e + e - e+ e- VALUE (keV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 5 5.55 0.14 0.02 OUR EVALUATION We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 9 ADAMS 5.71 0.16 13k 06A CLEO e + e - + - 9 AUBERT 5.57 0.19 7.8k 04 BABR e + e - + - 5.14 0.39 BAI 95B BES e+ e- 0.29 10 HSUEH 5.36 + 0.28 92 RVUE See mini-review - 4.72 0.35 ALEXANDER 89 RVUE See mini-review 10 BRANDELIK 79C DASP e + e - 4.4 0.6 11 BALDINI-... 4.6 0.8 75 FRAG e + e - 4.8 0.6 BOYARSKI 75 MRK1 e + e - 4.6 1.0 ESPOSITO 75B FRAM e + e - 9 Calculated by us from the reported values of (e + e - )B(+ - ) using B(+ - ) = (5.93 0.06)%. 10 From a simultaneous fit to e + e - , + - , and hadronic channels assuming (e + e - ) = (+ - ). 11 Assuming equal partial widths for e + e - and + - . + - VALUE (keV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 6 We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 5.13 0.52 BAI 95B BES e+ e- 4.8 0.6 BOYARSKI 75 MRK1 e + e - 5 1 ESPOSITO 75B FRAM e + e - VALUE (eV) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 184 90 BRANDELIK 79C DASP e + e - <5.4 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 7 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) J/(1S) (i)(e + e - )/(total) This combination of a partial width with the partial width into e + e - and with the total width is obtained from the integrated cross section into channelI in the e + e - annihilation. hadrons e + e - /total VALUE (keV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 1 5 / We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 12 BALDINI-... 4 0.8 75 FRAG e + e - 12 ESPOSITO 3.9 0.8 75B FRAM e + e - 12 Data redundant with branching ratios or partial widths above. e + e - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 5 5 / 332.3 6.4 4.8 6.4 ANASHIN 10 KEDR 3.097 e + e - e + e - We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 350 20 BRANDELIK 79C DASP e + e - 13 BALDINI-... 320 70 75 FRAG e + e - 13 ESPOSITO 340 90 75B FRAM e + e - 13 FORD 360 100 75 SPEC e + e - 13 Data redundant with branching ratios or partial widths above. + - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 6 5 / ANASHIN 10 KEDR ADAMS 06A CLEO AUBERT 04 BABR data for averages, fits, limits, 3.097 e + e - + - e + e - + - e + e - + - etc. 75 DASP e + e - 75B FRAM e + e - 334 5 OUR AVERAGE 331.8 5.2 6.3 338.4 5.8 7.1 13k 330.1 7.7 7.3 7.8k We do not use the following 510 90 DASP 14 ESPOSITO 380 50 14 Data redundant with branching ratios or partial widths above. + - 0 e + e - /total VALUE (10-2 keV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 11 5 / 06D BABR 10.6 e + e - + - 0 2.2 0.3 0.2 170 AUBERT + - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 12 5 / 15 AUBERT 53.6 5.0 0.4 5.0 788 07AU BABR 10.6 e + e - + - 15 AUBERT 07AU reports [ J/(1S) + - J/(1S) e + e - / total ] [B((782) + - 0 )] = 47.8 3.1 3.2 eV which we divide by our best value B((782) + - 0 ) = (89.2 0.7) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 8 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) K (892)0 K (1430)0 + c.c. e + e - /total 2 VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN 14 5 / COMMENT 33 4 1 317 23 16,17 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e - + - K + K - 16 Dividing by 2/3 to take into account that B(K 0 K + - ) = 2/3. 17 AUBERT 07AK reports [ J/(1S) K (892)0 K (1430)0 + c.c. J/(1S) 2 e + e - /total ] [B(K (1430) K )] = 16.4 1.1 1.4 eV which we divide by 2 our best value B(K (1430) K ) = (49.9 1.2) 10-2 . Our first error is their 2 experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. K (892)0 K 2 (1770)0 + c.c. K (892)0 K - + + c.c. e + e - / 15 5 / total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 3.8 0.4 0.3 110 14 18 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e - + - K + K - 18 Dividing by 2/3 to take into account that B(K 0 K + - ) = 2/3. K + K (892)- + c.c. e + e - /total VALUE (eV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 17 5 / 29.0 1.7 1.3 1.7 AUBERT 08S BABR 10.6 e + e - K + K (892)- K + K (892)- + c.c. K + K - 0 e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 18 5 / 10.96 0.85 0.70 155 AUBERT 08S BABR 10.6 e + e - K + K - 0 K + K (892)- + c.c. K 0 K e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 19 5 / 16.76 1.70 1.00 89 AUBERT 08S BABR 10.6 e + e - K 0 K S K 0 K (892)0 + c.c. e + e - /total VALUE (eV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 20 5 / 26.6 2.5 1.5 2.5 AUBERT 08S BABR 10.6 e + e - K 0 K (892)0 K 0 K (892)0 + c.c. K 0 K e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 21 5 / 17.70 1.70 1.00 94 AUBERT 08S BABR 10.6 e + e - K 0 K S K K e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 30 5 / 19 AUBERT 3.70 1.98 0.03 24 07AU BABR 10.6 e + e - K + K - 19 AUBERT 07AU reports [ J/(1S) K K J/(1S) e + e - / total ] [B((782) + - 0 )] = 3.3 1.3 1.2 eV which we divide by our best value B((782) + - 0 ) = (89.2 0.7) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 9 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 2( + - ) e + e - /total VALUE (10-2 keV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 32 5 / 0.96 0.19 0.01 35 06D BABR 10.6 e + e - 2( + - ) 20 AUBERT 06D reports [ J/(1S) 2( + - ) J/(1S) e + e - / total ] + K - )] = (0.47 0.09 0.03) 10-2 keV which we divide by [B((1020) K our best value B((1020) K + K - ) = (48.9 0.5) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. 20 AUBERT + - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 40 5 / 09 BELL 4.8 0.4 OUR AVERAGE 4.52 0.48 0.04 254 23 5.33 0.71 0.05 103 10.6 e + e - K + K - + - 22 AUBERT,BE 06D BABR 10.6 e + e - K + K - + - 21 SHEN 21 SHEN 09 reports 4.50 0.41 0.26 eV from a measurement of [ J/(1S) + - J/(1S) e + e - /total ] [B((1020) K + K - )] assuming B((1020) K + K - ) = (49.2 0.6) 10-2 , which we rescale to our best value B((1020) K + K - ) = (48.9 0.5) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. 22 AUBERT,BE 06D reports [ J/(1S) + - J/(1S) e + e - / total ] [B((1020) K + K - )] = 2.61 0.30 0.18 eV which we divide by our best value B((1020) K + K - ) = (48.9 0.5) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. 0 0 e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 41 5 / 3.15 0.88 0.03 23 23 AUBERT,BE 06D BABR 10.6 e + e - K + K - 0 0 23 AUBERT,BE 06D reports [ J/(1S) 0 0 J/(1S) e + e - / total ] + K - )] = 1.54 0.40 0.16 eV which we divide by our best value [B((1020) K B((1020) K + K - ) = (48.9 0.5) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 44 5 / 6.1 2.7 0.4 24 AUBERT 6 07AU BABR 10.6 e + e - 24 AUBERT 07AU quotes J/ B(J/ ) B( K + K - ) B( 3) = ee 0.84 0.37 0.05 eV. f0 (980) + - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 51 5 / 1.21 0.23 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.2. 1.48 0.27 0.09 60 11 25 SHEN 09 BELL 10.6 e + e - K + K - + - 26 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e - + - K + K - 1.02 0.24 0.01 20 5 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 10 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) 25 Multiplied by 2/3 to take into account the + - mode only. Using B( K + K - ) = (49.2 0.6)%. 26 AUBERT 07AK reports [ J/(1S) f (980) + - J/(1S) 0 e + e - /total ] [B((1020) K + K - )] = 0.50 0.11 0.04 eV which we divide by our best value B((1020) K + K - ) = (48.9 0.5) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. f0 (980) 0 0 e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 52 5 / 0.96 0.40 0.01 7.0 2.8 27 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e - 0 0 K + K - 27 AUBERT 07AK reports [ J/(1S) f (980) 0 0 J/(1S) e + e - / 0 total ] [B((1020) K + K - )] = 0.47 0.19 0.05 eV which we divide by our best value B((1020) K + K - ) = (48.9 0.5) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. + - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 56 5 / 28 AUBERT 2.24 0.98 0.03 9 07AU BABR 10.6 e + e - + - 28 AUBERT 07AU reports [ J/(1S) + - J/(1S) e + e - / total ] [B( + - 0 )] = 0.51 0.22 0.03 eV which we divide by our best value B( + - 0 ) = (22.74 0.28) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. K (892)0 K (892)0 e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 65 5 / 1.28 0.40 0.11 25 8 29 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e - + - K + K - 29 Dividing by (2/3)2 to take twice into account that B(K 0 K + - ) = 2/3. f2 (1270) e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 66 5 / 4.0 0.7 0.1 44 7 30,31 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e - + - K + K - 30 Using B( (K + K)- ) = (49.3 0.6)%. 31 AUBERT 07AK reports [ J/(1S) f (1270) J/(1S) e + e - / 2 total ] [B(f2 (1270) )] = 3.41 0.55 0.28 eV which we divide by our best value 2.4 B(f2 (1270) ) = (84.8 + 1.2 ) 10-2 . Our first error is their experiment's error - and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. 2( + - ) 0 e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 78 5 / 07AU BABR 10.6 e + e - 2( + - ) 0 303 5 18 4990 AUBERT + - 0 e + e - /total VALUE (keV) DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 80 5 / 04N BABR 10.6 e + e - + - 0 0.122 0.005 0.008 AUBERT,B + - 0 K + K - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 81 5 / 107.0 4.3 6.4 768 AUBERT 07AU BABR 10.6 e + e - K + K - + - 0 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 11 Created: 10/13/2010 15:57 Citation: K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), JP G 37, 075021 (2010) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov) + - K + K - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 83 5 / 36.3 1.3 2.1 1586 58 1.3 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e - + - K + K - We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. 33.6 2.7 2.7 233 32 AUBERT 05D BABR 10.6 e + e - K + K - + - 32 Superseded by AUBERT 07AK. + - K + K - e + e - /total VALUE (eV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT 84 5 / 25.9...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern