rpp2010-rev-ckm-matrix

rpp2010-rev-ckm-matrix - 11. CKM quark-mixing matrix 1 11....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 11. CKM quark-mixing matrix 1 11. THE CKM QUARK-MIXING MATRIX Revised February 2010 by A. Ceccucci (CERN), Z. Ligeti (LBNL), and Y. Sakai (KEK). 11.1. Introduction The masses and mixings of quarks have a common origin in the Standard Model (SM). They arise from the Yukawa interactions with the Higgs condensate, L Y = Y d ij Q I Li d I Rj Y u ij Q I Li u I Rj + h . c ., (11 . 1) where Y u,d are 3 3 complex matrices, is the Higgs field, i, j are generation labels, and is the 2 2 antisymmetric tensor. Q I L are left-handed quark doublets, and d I R and u I R are right-handed down- and up-type quark singlets, respectively, in the weak-eigenstate basis. When acquires a vacuum expectation value, = (0 , v/ 2), Eq. (11 . 1) yields mass terms for the quarks. The physical states are obtained by diagonalizing Y u,d by four unitary matrices, V u,d L,R , as M f diag = V f L Y f V f R ( v/ 2), f = u, d . As a result, the charged-current W interactions couple to the physical u Lj and d Lk quarks with couplings given by V CKM V u L V d L = V ud V us V ub V cd V cs V cb V td V ts V tb . (11 . 2) This Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix [1,2] is a 3 3 unitary matrix. It can be parameterized by three mixing angles and the CP-violating KM phase [2]. Of the many possible conventions, a standard choice has become [3] V = c 12 c 13 s 12 c 13 s 13 e i s 12 c 23 c 12 s 23 s 13 e i c 12 c 23 s 12 s 23 s 13 e i s 23 c 13 s 12 s 23 c 12 c 23 s 13 e i c 12 s 23 s 12 c 23 s 13 e i c 23 c 13 , (11 . 3) where s ij = sin ij , c ij = cos ij , and is the phase responsible for all CP-violating phenomena in avor-changing processes in the SM. The angles ij can be chosen to lie in the first quadrant, so s ij , c ij 0. It is known experimentally that s 13 s 23 s 12 1, and it is convenient to exhibit this hierarchy using the Wolfenstein parameterization. We define [46] s 12 = = | V us | p | V ud | 2 + | V us | 2 , s 23 = A 2 = V cb V us , s 13 e i = V ub = A 3 ( + i ) = A 3 ( + i ) 1 A 2 4 1 2 [1 A 2 4 ( + i )] . (11 . 4) These relations ensure that + i = ( V ud V ub ) / ( V cd V cb ) is phase-convention-independent, and the CKM matrix written in terms of , A, , and is unitary to all orders in . The definitions of , reproduce all approximate results in the literature. For example, = (1 2 / 2 + . . . ) and we can write V CKM to O ( 4 ) either in terms of , or, traditionally, V = 1 2 / 2 A 3 ( i ) 1 2 / 2 A 2 A 3 (1 i ) A 2 1 + O ( 4 ) . (11 . 5) K. Nakamura et al. , JPG 37 , 075021 (2010) (http://pdg.lbl.gov) July 30, 2010 14:36 2 11. CKM quark-mixing matrix Figure 11.1: Sketch of the unitarity triangle.Sketch of the unitarity triangle....
View Full Document

Page1 / 21

rpp2010-rev-ckm-matrix - 11. CKM quark-mixing matrix 1 11....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online