paper 2 stuff - Mill He doesn’t completely disagree with...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
brainstorming possible concrete cases wherein Mill and Hobhouse might plausibly disagree on whether interference with self-harming behavior is warranted. Hobhouse-There is no part of a man’s life that does not have an effect on others
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Mill- He doesn’t completely disagree with Hobhouse but he thinks that we should not interfere...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 06/09/2011 for the course PHIL Philosophy taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '11 term at Oglethorpe.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online