{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

2nd paper outline - Example My sister who dropped out of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 Caffrey Francis October 14, 2010 Dr. Felis M/W/F- 11:00-11:50 Outline Paper Two: Liberal views of human nature Society is justified in interfering with an individual’s choices and actions when those actions primarily harm the individual. Whose position do I think is more correct, and why? First- Hypothetical situation where coercive interference in individual liberty would not be justified according to Mill but would be justified according to Hobhouse ( Avoid )- Mental illness, addiction, and similar matters Mill - We should not interfere Hobhouse - There is no part of a man’s life that does not have an effect on others
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Example- My sister who dropped out of Shorter University-Explain- How I reacted ~-Still do not approve of her choice …. .~-Explain- How her decision affected her family then including me as a big part of it ~-How her decision now has affected how her life has turned out and how it has impacted her new family ~ 2 Second- Justify your claim that Mill would not and Hobhouse would consider interference warranted Third- Then return to the more abstract question of who is right?- To make an argument for why I think one of the two positions seems better justified than the other...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}