foragers h-g ch11 - Hunter­Gatherers Foragers...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Hunter­Gatherers/ Foragers Hunter­Gatherers/ Foragers Chapter 11 Key Characters of Key Characters of Hunter­Gatherers (H­G) s Band – influence of leaders limited – leaders w/o formal authority Egalitarian s Kin­based s = social relations promote flexibility s = resource rights to ALL members s Anthropological studies of H­G Anthropological studies of H­G have emphasized: A tight link between environment and social organization and development After reading chapter 11, After reading chapter 11, answer: 1) How does forager social organization and complexity vary depending on abundance and availability of natural resources? s 2) Describe with at least 2 examples how family structure and economic systems are linked s ?s continued: ?s continued: s 3) How do the Ainu bridge the gap between bears and humans? – give examples where bears are equivalent with humans and gods Numaym concept in book Numaym s Be able to define and discuss this... H­G/ foragers­ important in H­G/ foragers­ important in Anthropology s As the basis of evolutionary studies – e.g. Lewis­H Morgan; 1970 ecological idealism – assumption: complexity evolved from simplicity Model for small scale, egalitarian societies (analog) s Perceptions of H­G have conformed to and effected change in theory s For two centuries H­G have For two centuries H­G have been considered s Simple – base of the unilineal model Static s “Primitive Communism” s Isolated s – e.g., Kalahari desert periphery (San, ! Kung, “Bushman”) Primitive Communism Primitive Communism Collective ownership of means of production (materials and tools) s reciprocity and equal sharing s little emphasis on accumulation s Primitive Communism as Primitive Communism as original social form? s Is this fundamental primordial human nature? Recently Recently H­G construct w/o empirical or evolutionary validity s To describe a mode of subsistence only (“living off the land”)­> ok, but: s Cross­cultural analysis ­> the essential qualities of h­g’s do not hold... s Unilineal model assumes: Unilineal model assumes: Simple cultures (living h­g s) have long histories of equality and s they are non­dynamic s s Pleistocene (H­G)­>10,000 BP­> 8,500 (Chiefdoms) ­> 6,000 BP (States) NO STRUCTURAL LINK NO STRUCTURAL LINK BETWEEN H­G SUBSISTENCE and Egalitarianism s Generalized reciprocity s Settlement mobility s Kinship patterns s Now we have come to Now we have come to understand that “H­Gs” are A historical consequence of state expansion and political oppression s Representative of a HUGE diversity of lifestyles s – gypsies – San, !Kung – Mexican Kickapoo In Anthropology now: 2 main In Anthropology now: 2 main schools of thought on H­G’s Evolutionary or Behavioral Ecology & Revisionist Ethnography (Political Economy/History) Revisionist Ethnography Revisionist Ethnography attention to roles of encapsulation and exploitation, shaping traits assumed to be the product of natural selection or adaptation s Culture and history matter s “Foragers” have histories of contact with complex societies s World Systems s Film: First Contact Film: First Contact s Assumptions about primitiveness... ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 06/11/2011 for the course ANTH 101 taught by Professor Dr.sharynjones during the Fall '11 term at University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online