SAMPLE CA E - CLAW1001: Case Analysis Introduction In...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CLAW1001: Case Analysis Introduction In Alphapharm 1 the Court was faced with a complex factual scenario, appearing to challenge a longstanding principle of contract law from the authority L’Estrange v F Graucob 2 . The following case analysis will discuss the prominent decisions of the Court emphasising its bearing in legal and commercial contexts. Facts The facts regard flu inoculations, which were damaged while being transported by Toll between its warehouse and Alphapharm’s customers. The dispute which arose concerned which party would be held liable for the damage. It is important to note Alphapharm dealt indirectly with Toll through a third party, Richard Thomson, who signed an acceptance to Freight Rates and an “Application for Credit” on Alphapharm’s behalf. The reverse side of the application contained 15 “Conditions of Contract”, excluding and indemnifying Toll for any damages caused to the goods. Richard Thomson neglected to read these conditions. Issues The High Court focused primarily on whether the exclusion clauses formed part of the contract between Toll and Alphapharm, known as the ‘terms of contract issue’. Rationes In appeal decisions rationes can come only from those legal issues that were in contention. 3 The following rationes were the reason for deciding this case. Firstly ‘where there is no suggestion of vitiation, and no claim for equitable or statutory relief, a person who signs a document known to contain contractual terms, and affect legal relations, is bound by those terms, and it is immaterial that the person has not read the document’. 4 Secondly, the Court decided that the meaning of contractual 1 Toll (FGCT) Pty Limited v Alphapharm Pty Limited [2004] HCA 52 ( Alphapharm ) 2 L’Estrange v F Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394 (L’Estrange) 3 Cook, C, Creyke, R, Geddes, R & Hamer, D (2005). Laying Down the Law . 6th ed. Sydney: LexisNexis. 4 Alphapharm above nl 1 Chapter 57 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
terms should be judged by ‘what a reasonable person would have understood them to mean’ by considering the text but also the surrounding circumstances. Analysis
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/10/2011 for the course CLAW 1001 taught by Professor Giuseppe during the Three '11 term at University of Sydney.

Page1 / 5

SAMPLE CA E - CLAW1001: Case Analysis Introduction In...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online