095001 - HUGH LLOYD-JONES T WO C ONJE CT URE S ON P I NDAR...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
H UGH L LOYD -J ONES T WO C ONJECTURES ON P INDAR’S F OURTH P AEAN (50–3) aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 95 (1993) 1–5 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
1 T WO C ONJECTURES ON P INDAR ' S F OURTH P AEAN (50-3) Ian Rutherford has lately been kind enough to allow me an early view of a detailed study of the paean he has been preparing, in which he has discussed the difficult problems of the Fourth Paean in detail. And now Lutz Käppel has published a learned study of the same genre (Paian: Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung (Berlin, 1992), which includes, in its third chapter (p. 87f.), the most detailed commentary on the Fourth Paean so far published. Written for the Ceans to perform at Delos, this poem tells how Euxantios, son of Minos by the Cean princess Dexithea, refused to abandon his rocky native island for the sake of a kingdom in his father's much greater island, Crete. The work of Rutherford and Käppel has stimulated me into making an attempt to solve two major cruces which have puzzled everyone who has had to do with this poem, ever since Grenfell and Hunt in 1908 published Part V of the Oxyrhynchus Papyri and with it P.Oxy. 841, which contains almost all that we possess of it. Addressing his own mind, i.e. himself, Euxantios tells it to leave alone the cypress, and to leave alone something else which I will not at this point try to translate. Then he says that to him has been given a small. .. - then follow corrupt words - but that he has no share in mourning or in revolutions: ¶a, frÆn, kupãri!- !on, ¶a d¢ nomÚn peridãion. §mo‹ dÉ Ùl¤gon d°dotai ya[ oÈ peny°vn dÉ ¶laxon, <oÈ> !ta!¤vn (50-3) 52 e S ]dotai ya`[ et Plutarcho (vid. infra) suppl. Blass et edd.pr. Plutarchus, De exilio p.602 F œi dÉ ¶je!tin eF! mikrån épobãnti n∞!on oÈ mikr«n éphllãxyai kak«n, oto! êyliÒ! §!ti mØ pro!lal«n •aut«i tå Pindarikã mhdÉ §pãidvn pollãki! §lafrån kupãri!!on fil°ein, §çn d¢ nomÒn KrÆta! perida¤vn. §mo‹ dÉ Ùl¤gon m¢n gç! d°dotai, ˜yen êdru!, peny°vn dÉ oÈk ¶laxon !ta!¤vn oÈd¢ pro!tagmãtvn ≤gemonik«n oÈdÉ Ípourgi«n §n politika›! xre¤ai! ka‹ leitourgi«n du!paraitÆtvn. nomÚn peridãion - the latter word is Hermann's correction of Plutarch's perida¤vn - was taken by the first editors to mean 'the region around Mount Ida'. Grenfell and Hunt were rebuked by Housman, Cl.Rev. 22 (1908) 10 = Classical Papers (1972) II 766 for not knowing that the iota of the word ÖIdh was long, and Wilamowitz, Pindaros (1922), 475 raised the same objection, taking peridãion to mean 'ein Revier zwischen Feinden'. Käppel, op.cit., p.124, n.127 rightly objects that the Cretans were not enemies, but when he defends the view of the first editors, quoting as a parallel the variable quantity of the first syllable of xru!Ò! , he does not convince. The existence of the common noun ‡dh , meaning
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2 H.Lloyd-Jones 'timber', seems to me to supply an extra reason for thinking it must unlikely that the quantity
Background image of page 4
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/17/2011 for the course HISTORY 11 taught by Professor Abualyouser during the Spring '11 term at Ain Shams University.

Page1 / 7

095001 - HUGH LLOYD-JONES T WO C ONJE CT URE S ON P I NDAR...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online