micro-fall-2006-10

micro-fall-2006-10 - 141 5.2 Indirect Utility Function and...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
141 5.2 Indirect Utility Function and Expenditure Functions Each household’s optimization problem can be writ- tenintwoforms: ( i ) as a utility maximization problem for a given bud- get constraint ,or ( ii ) as an expenditure minimizing problem for a given utility level . Under some assumptions on the utility functions, both problems are equivalent, i.e. the optimal consumption bundle is the same. This equivalence can be used to understand the prop- erties of the demand functions.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
142 The dual problem: The household’s problem now becomes: Choose ( x 1 ; x 2 ) so that e ( x 1 ; x 2 )= p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 is minimized under the constraints u ( x 1 ; x 2 ) ¯ u x 1 0 x 2 0 . The solution of the household’s problem determines: ( i ) The Hicks’ demand functions for good 1 and 2 : ˜ x 1 = h 1 ( p 1 ; p 2 u ) ˜ x 2 = h 2 ( p 1 ; p 2 u ) ( ii ) The expenditure function ˜ e = e ( p 1 ; p 2 u ) .
Background image of page 2
143 Example 28 Cobb-Douglas utility function u ( x
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 8

micro-fall-2006-10 - 141 5.2 Indirect Utility Function and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online