This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Running head: ACADEMIC HONESTY 1 Academic Honesty Angel Bingham GEN/105 May 8, 2011 Dr. Christopher Summerlin ACADEMIC HONESTY 2 Academic Honesty Both of the articles reviewed spoke of studies conducted to compare cheating in an online versus a face-to-face environment. Cheating is broken down into two main types: Planned and Panic cheating. Planned cheating involves preparing to be dishonest. Examples could be; copying homework, writing the answers to a test on the hand, or plagiarism. Planned cheating is often viewed to carry a more severe punishment than panic cheating. Panic cheating is cheating without premeditation. For instance, taking a test and panicking when the student does not know the answer, and in turn looking at a classmates paper. Panic cheating is viewed as the most common form of academic dishonesty. The probability of online cheating is significantly lower than cheating in the traditional...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/21/2011 for the course GEN 105 taught by Professor Adams during the Spring '08 term at University of Phoenix.
- Spring '08