{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

logic10review2

# logic10review2 - (There will be one section of definitions...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

PHIL 110, Logic Instructor: Merritt Second Exam, Review Guide The Second Exam will cover chapters 2 and 3, but you are still responsible for knowing information from chapters 1 and 4. You will be allowed ONE sheet of notebook paper (front and back) with any information you wish to put on that paper, including rules, example proofs, and connectives/meanings. This is NOT a cheat sheet – if you don’t know how to use those rules, you will not be able to complete the proofs on the test. As to what you need to know: Definitions: You should be able to define: - Valid Argument - Invalid Argument - Sound Argument - Valid Argument Form - Invalid Argument Form

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: (There will be one section of definitions where I will ask you to define some or all of these terms.) Proofs: Be able to construct syntactic proofs demonstrating that the given sequents or theorems are valid, using all the rules we have learned in PL: -Premise Introduction-• I/•E-MP, MT, CP/A-↔I/↔E-DNI/DNE-vI/vE-RAA (You will have a couple proofs in which no assumptions are necessary – ie-you can derive the conclusion directly from the premises – and then a few medium difficulty proofs that will require one or more assumptions, and then a couple difficult proofs, combining assumption strategies, nesting assumptions, etc.)...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 2

logic10review2 - (There will be one section of definitions...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online