History Paper Outline (midterm)

History Paper Outline (midterm) - (When I write papers, I...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
(When I write papers, I find it easy to make everything into an outline and put it together in the end. The missing spaces will be filled in… Will I need a third argument?) Introduction: 1. Thesis: 1. The Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution in order to have a strong national government with supreme power over state governments, which in turn helped the people of American have a say in their government. Body Paragraph #1: Argument: 1.Leaving too much power in the hands of the states would only create another confederacy type of government with little power to act. Opposing Sides Example: 1. The Anti-Federalist had a tough belief that a strong national government would destroy any power left to the states individual governments. Brutus I once stated: “For all laws made, in pursuance of this constitution, are the supreme lay of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of the different states to the contrary notwithstanding.” Opposing Sides Explanation: 1. Brutus believes that this constitution will bind all state government and legislature to the national constitution. He makes it seem as if the state will “puppet” the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/26/2011 for the course HIST 264 taught by Professor Prof.p during the Spring '11 term at Saint Louis.

Page1 / 3

History Paper Outline (midterm) - (When I write papers, I...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online