Critical Thinking - harm a victim suffered irrelevant in a...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Critical Thinking 1. The Supreme Court has a greater obligation to protect the rights of victims than those of criminals. (B) 2. It is clear to every intelligent person that the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, protection against cruel and unusual punishment, does not bar the use of victim impact statements. (A) 3. Victim reforms will destroy the constitutional rights of the accused. (C) 4. The conservative, prejudiced Supreme Court judges are too stupid to recognize the rights of the accused. (C) 5. Every decent lawyer believes the harm a victim suffered because of a defendant should be considered when determining punishment (B) . 6. Victims have absolutely no rights at all. (B) 7. Everyone agrees that victim reforms are false promises made by legislators seeking to please voters worried about crime. (C) 8. The victims’ rights movement developed because victims of crime felt they
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
had no rights in the criminal justice system. (N) 9. Thurgood Marshall, a pro-criminal, bleeding-heart liberal, considers the
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: harm a victim suffered irrelevant in a criminal trial. (C) 10. As Justice John Paul Stevens correctly points out, the defendant should have more rights than the state in a criminal trial. (D) 11. Victim impact statements force juries to base their decisions on emotion rather than on objective facts. (B) 12. As Deborah Kelly, chair of the American Bar Associations Victims Committee, accurately concludes, victims satisfaction with the criminal justice system depends more on how they were treated than how severely their assailants were punished. (D) 13. Everyone knows that judges let criminals off too easily. (A) 14. Intelligent people agree that victims rights deny the accused the right to a fair and impartial trial. (D) 15. As the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, William H. Rehnquist, states, there is no constitutional rule that excludes victim impact statements. ( D)...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 06/28/2011 for the course HSM 210 taught by Professor Shellymcdowell during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.

Page1 / 2

Critical Thinking - harm a victim suffered irrelevant in a...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online