This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Derrick Bickerstaff COM 220 M. Hamilton March 22, 2011 Checkpoint: Research Paper Revision In the review of my paper I got a very thorough feedback from my instructor as well as my peer. In my instructors comments I found out that I could place the graphs that I presented supporting my cause in different spots. This was to highlight the facts with a visual back up for the points I had made. I also was told by my instructor that I had one inappropriate placing in the introduction of one of my arguments. In my peer review I was given an outstanding performance. The peer liked my submission and stated that it could be submitted immediately. All grammar was check and all spelling was intact after I consulted with the CWE for their review. With the suggestion I got from my instructor I will use her suggestion to identify any misuse of verb to properly make my point. Also I will use her suggestions to place and introduce my graphs into better spots in the paper. I have used these critiques to do just that. I have revised my graphs into better spots in the paper....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/30/2011 for the course COMMUNICAT com220 taught by Professor Klump during the Spring '11 term at University of Phoenix.
- Spring '11