{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

HW#4 - basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications...

Info icon This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CE 1000 HW#4 For the outcome of this case I would choose choice number 3. I chose this for many reasons. First if he did not fire Ernest he would be in violation of Ethics Code 2:c, which states that and engineer shall not affix their signature and/or seals to any engineering plan or document dealing with subject matter in which they lack competence by virtue of education or experience, nor to any such plan or document not prepared under their direct supervisory control. I chose this because employing Ernest would put his seal of approval in question of unreliable reported information. 5:b, Engineers should negotiate contracts for professional services fairly and only on the
Image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: basis of demonstrated competence and qualifications for the type of professional service required. This backs up my choice in that Ernest jeopardizes the engineers level of professional service. 6:a, Engineers shall not knowingly associate with nor permit the use of their names nor firm names in business ventures by any person or firm which they know, or have reason to belive, are engaging in business or professional practices of a fraudulent or dishonest nature. Ernest clearly violates this and is deemed un-reliable....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}