POLI4023_Exam2_EssayQuestions

POLI4023_Exam2_EssayQuestions - POLI 4023 Exam 2 Review...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
POLI 4023 Exam 2 Review – Essay Questions 1. Compare and contrast the inquisitorial versus the accusatorial traditions. What problems emerge in the accusatorial tradition? What are its benefits? In Civil Law, the two dominant systems are the accusatorial tradition and the inquisitorial tradition. The accusatorial tradition was developed in England during the Middle Ages, 500-1500 A.D. The accusatorial tradition is also known as the adversarial process, and it is the system that is used by the United States as well as Great Britain. The characteristics of the accusatorial tradition are as follows. First of all, in this system, a public trial is held, and the accuser is identified. The charges are specified, and evidence is disclosed during the trial. In the accusatorial system, the trial is conducted by set procedures, and it is overseen by judges who serve as neutral referees. Also, the offender is presumed innocent until proven guilty in this system. Thus, these are the characteristics of the accusatory tradition. The second tradition is known as the inquisitorial tradition. This tradition was developed in the European continent during the inquisition of the Catholic Church. As opposed to the accusatory tradition and Adversariality, the inquisitorial tradition is more about investigation. This system is currently still being used by the continent of Europe. The characteristics of the inquisitorial tradition are as such. Firstly, unlike the accusatory process, the trial in the inquisitorial system is not public, and is actually held in secret. In the past, judges in this particular system even wore hooded robes to conceal their identities. Also in this system, the accuser is not identified, and evidence is not disclosed. Charges, beyond the general charge of heresy, are not specified in this tradition. The offender is presumed guilty until proven innocent; however, the system currently has more protections for the accused. The main purpose of this system is to extract confession in order to return to God’s grace. There are both problems and benefits that emerge in the accusatory tradition. Because this process is an adversary process, some argue that the focus of the accusatory system is too heavily centered around winning the case. Another issue with this process is that most cases, unlike in the inquisitorial tradition, are solved through the plea bargaining process and settlement. These rarely go to trial. This process can also lead to great injustice if the defendant has an unskilled attorney. However, there are some benefits to the accusatory process as well. One benefit is that in this process,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 07/10/2011 for the course POLI 4023 taught by Professor Moyer during the Summer '09 term at LSU.

Page1 / 4

POLI4023_Exam2_EssayQuestions - POLI 4023 Exam 2 Review...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online